Pyro
General
The Mastermind
Posts: 895
|
Post by Pyro on Jul 9, 2010 21:38:12 GMT -5
Pyro, I don't think atoms can be copied. That's why a person is scanned. It makes a computer copy of said atom, which allows the computer to keep the copy or also find a place where it can assemble atoms into a being.
|
|
|
Post by darkmartio on Jul 9, 2010 21:39:44 GMT -5
And how is the computer going to assemple the atoms?
|
|
Pyro
General
The Mastermind
Posts: 895
|
Post by Pyro on Jul 9, 2010 21:45:14 GMT -5
And how is the computer going to assemple the atoms? As Chaosky said, it throws the atoms across space to the place one wishes to transport to.
|
|
|
Post by darkmartio on Jul 9, 2010 21:47:26 GMT -5
Oh ok.
|
|
Chaosky
Dedicated
Mr. Professor Chaosky
Posts: 738
|
Post by Chaosky on Jul 9, 2010 22:24:52 GMT -5
I agree with the portal thing. I don't quite like the idea of copying every aspect of an object's matter and transfering it somewhere else, while the original is destroyed. Also, I want to talk about these "Gravitons" Chaosky mentioned. If all matter contains these, is it possible to rid an object of all forms of gravity and force? Would that mean the object's molecules would simply fall apart, or will they remain connected with each other and simply will not be affected by anything? Anyone wish to go into this further? I'm not trying to change the topic, but I would like to disscuss more on this. To elaborate, suppose these Bosons were somehow removed from, let's say, a ball. Would it dissipate or suddenly just float away? I know other particles keep atoms and molecules together or something along the lines of that. Assuming that we could alter the universe in such a way so that the ball did not produce gravitons, the end result would be that it would no longer attract objects to itself. It would still be affected by gravity from other objects. Also, taking away the strong nuclear force would cause the ball dissipate. (The strong nuclear force is one of the things that binds subatomic particles together.)
|
|
|
Post by hydroxianchaos on Jul 9, 2010 23:36:38 GMT -5
Thank you. That's what I though. Any other topics to disscuss about?
|
|
|
Post by darkmartio on Jul 15, 2010 13:46:07 GMT -5
I WANT to discuss about blackholes. Are they the same thing as wormholes?
|
|
Pyro
General
The Mastermind
Posts: 895
|
Post by Pyro on Jul 15, 2010 13:49:30 GMT -5
I WANT to discuss about blackholes. Are they the same thing as wormholes? No, wormholes are essentially holes that bend space and time. No one is quite sure about black holes, though. The suck things in, and it appears as if it destroys them... But the matter has to go somewhere... Unless it's the universal recycling bin like a computer.
|
|
|
Post by hydroxianchaos on Jul 15, 2010 17:24:44 GMT -5
Matter can not be destroyed under any circumstances. It is theorized by a bunch of hooligans called I belive "scientists" that black hole simply compress any object that sucks it in, infinitely. And object can be slowly and gradually compressed to any size. Black holes are also theorized to be caused by them dead stars. Y' know, when they grow really big and then shrinks into either a dead star ending up as either a white or dark dwarf, a neutron star, or they will be so compressed from shrinking, they shall, theoretically, hold immense amounts of gravity, and then therefore, suck up everything, including light, which is why they cannot be seen. They are reported to give off great amounts of X Rays, due to the hyper speed particles flying into the hole. As for wormholes, they are also theoriezied to be created by black holes. I hear there are different variations of the black and worm hole(s), so you'll need to wiki them all.
|
|
|
Post by Ray on Jul 15, 2010 17:39:45 GMT -5
My brain imploded. Thanks guys.
|
|
|
Post by hydroxianchaos on Jul 15, 2010 18:11:31 GMT -5
You are welcome.
|
|
Jojenga
Dedicated
Hrgleblah
Posts: 551
|
Post by Jojenga on Jul 15, 2010 18:52:33 GMT -5
NEW TOPIC
Cloning: Plausability factors, ways it can help, and how it would work.
Go.
|
|
|
Post by hydroxianchaos on Jul 15, 2010 19:17:01 GMT -5
*cracks knuckles* Damn. I've got some typing to do. Okay. I belive clonning can do both wonders and problems. NĂºmero uno, they can prevent the human race population from decreasing in terms of making cloned soilders. Con: These clones will live to die, so there may be issues in their rights. Another pro: If one dies, a clone of that person could be made with the same memories if designed to do so. Con: This person is not the original and they may have issues on why should they exist in the first place. Pro: If you mean cloning for other things, an arm could be clonned to replace limbs. Then again, this ain't the kind of cloning that is done the same way, so it may be difficult to replicate an arm and sew it on someone, when if you just play with genes you can get someone to regreow their arm. However, clonning would be safer. Now, there are quite a lot of clonning methods. Here are a few: Method one: Someone's DNA is copied and is regrown in a womb. However, most clones that are made this way end up looking a little to similar to the original even at birth. Method two: You grow a clone like a "Test tube baby". Basically, it's method one, yet the fertilized egg is put in a tube or chamber, instead of comming out through birth. Method Three: DNA is copied and applied to a peice of flesh from the original along with some gene engineering to make the flesh grow into a clone. This way is highly unstable and may possibly not work. (I made it up ) Well, I made the foundation and first floor, now someone shall build on top of it.
|
|
Chaosky
Dedicated
Mr. Professor Chaosky
Posts: 738
|
Post by Chaosky on Jul 15, 2010 19:59:48 GMT -5
I WANT to discuss about blackholes. Are they the same thing as wormholes? Black holes are also theorized to have exit points called white holes. ___________________________ Cloning plausibility factor: We do not yet have the technology to extract the DNA of a cell perfectly, so the results of cloning experiments are often unstable. However, the advancements required to extract DNA properly are rapidly being made. Plausibility in the future will be high. Uses: Fakers How it would work: I've always been a fan of growing cells in a nutrient-rich tank. Just make a cell with the appropiate DNA, give it what it needs, and watch it grow.
|
|
|
Post by hydroxianchaos on Jul 15, 2010 20:56:14 GMT -5
I got method one since that is the same way they cloned that sheep. Just for all of you to know the one method that fully works. I still wonder when we become so corrupt we start to clone people.
|
|